Lookin for feedback

topic posted Fri, June 26, 2009 - 1:26 PM by  ~taz~
Share/Save/Bookmark
Advertisement
Finally got a recent video of myself spinnin on youtube, and I'd like some feedback if ya wanna.

Technique? Flow? Tech/Flow combined? A good thing?

Helpful criticism.

www.youtube.com/watch

thanks!
posted by:
~taz~
North Carolina
Advertisement
Advertisement
  • Re: Lookin for feedback

    Mon, June 29, 2009 - 5:06 AM
    i think you need to correct you stalls at first =)
    • Re: Lookin for feedback

      Mon, June 29, 2009 - 11:18 AM
      I think it is awesome that you posted for feedback, and put yourself out there like this. Big two thumbs up. My biggest suggestion is to start working a lot more on foot work. Do drills, up and down your practice area, that include how and where you are stepping. Be very specific about what your intention for each step is. Your spinning technique is very good, and really way more advanced then where your foot work/lower body work is. I would review some Yuta or older Nick Woosley videos as reference material.

      Hope that helps,
      Chad
      • Re: Lookin for feedback

        Mon, June 29, 2009 - 12:56 PM
        I totally agree. I would not have done this myself. I hate feedback even though everyone needs it. I can take constructive criticism, but prefer it in a one on one setting.

        Anyways, I am pretty beginner myself and have only been spinning fire for a little over a year. I have not seen it all, but I have seen some of the best. When you dropped the staff, you showed a lot of disappointment and that vibe transfers to the audience. If you act like it's no big deal and pick it up with confidence the audience reacts differently. I have seen someone drop one poi and then throw the other and say ground show over and bow. Some people thought it was just the end of the show and it was all intentional. LOL I really liked your flow and transitions.
        • Re: Lookin for feedback

          Mon, June 29, 2009 - 1:53 PM
          I find that I'm my own worst critic. Most people pull their punches so as not to offend you. But, and I tell people this all the time, the video camera is your best friend. If you want to be a pro spinner, and the video doesn't show a pro spinner, there's just no way of dancing around it. Friends may blow sunshine up your butt, but video never lies.
          • Re: Lookin for feedback

            Mon, June 29, 2009 - 2:05 PM
            true. I know a lot of things I need to work on from using my mirrors. I think that is why I am not ready to reach out for feedback. I have gotten a lot better with movement and by that I mean actually moving =)
  • Re: Lookin for feedback

    Mon, June 29, 2009 - 12:19 PM
    Okie dokie, You asked....
    I've got a "seen it all", jaded view of poi, in particular, so let me start by saying that your spin style reminds m a lot of Alien Jon. (It's a compliment, watch his youtube stuff)

    I'll be entirely happy if I never see another double fireball staff toss again. You want to impress someone? Try the double helix fireball/toss instead.
    You've got an ugly stall for changing directions on one poi. You might want to look for, or work up, something more clever. I like a one-arm wrap myself.
    Your footwork is fine, particularly when the average poi spinner is factored in. Yes, it could use some work, but so could everyone else"s. (Yes, including mine).
    Snakes are NOT a different tool. They're still poi. If you're going to try to pull off a poi/snake or poi/torch show, the two styles have to be notably and remarkably different or they quickly become the same show.
    Speaking of the snakes, that was a bit more grass lighting than I like to see. Naturally your conditions are a bit different than southern Cali, so you may not worry about wildfires as much, but it's still a safety factor to keep in mind.
    Staff tosses are so much cooler if you catch them. :o)
    You're staves are a little too long for your spin style and body form. hack 6" off the next set, and see if you can get some more weight towards the tips.

    I see you teetering between trying to do crisp tech stuff and flow. My feeling is that the level of tricks you're doing demands a certain precision. Tightening up your vertical stalls, isolations even your anti spins will make your show better. You have enough flow that you can carry a crisp routine. and you have enough footwork and imagination to avoid looking like a poibot. I think what you need is attitude. Develop a personality for the spinner in you. Doesn't have to be just one, but it starts with one. I'd say go for a bad boy, attack a phantom opponent with your style, growl a little when you do something hard, relax visibly when you pull it off. Whatever personality you develop will help focus costuming and flow style. and it will define your footwork.
    • Re: Lookin for feedback

      Mon, June 29, 2009 - 12:54 PM
      so, primarily what your spinning seemed to lack was transitions.

      both chad and tedward were touching on this, talking about footwork, flow, and tech vs flow.

      ultimately, the only answer is keep spinning.

      Im gonna guess that when you practice, you do a lot more working on one trick, and then moving onto the next, and dont just flow so often.

      i would recommend trying to balance the time between training individual techniques, and flowing between techniques.

      Keep up the good work.
      • Re: Lookin for feedback

        Mon, June 29, 2009 - 1:50 PM
        I don't consider transitions between tricks to be "flow". Yes, transitions allow flow to happen easier, but it's also about connecting to the music, to the audience, and being able to take the show where you want to rather then following some defined pattern.
        • Re: Lookin for feedback

          Tue, June 30, 2009 - 10:37 AM
          firstly, transitions between tricks are what make flow happen. Technical flow leads to artistic flow, and often time artistic flow leads to technique.

          how you get out of one technique and into another technique is what creates flow in any performance.


          secondly, some of the best fire spinners of our day are disconnected from the audience in their spinning. to say that it is a fundamental of good fire performance just isnt true.

          like i said, work your technique, work your transitions, work your flow.
          • Re: Lookin for feedback

            Tue, June 30, 2009 - 10:59 AM
            I would argue (in the most respectful way possible) that technique adds a higher degree of flow. "Flow" is an emergent property of poi (emergence is the way complex systems and patterns arise out of a multiplicity of relatively simple interactions). One could just do the 3-beat weave for an entire burn and hit every beat with the music and run around and dance and interact with the audience, and the emergent property of "flow" would be present, but it would be a very low level of flow. Adding more technique and transitions adds another layer to the flow. The emergent property of flow does not depend entirely on transitions any more than it depends on music or an audience. They are all parts that interact to create varying degrees and expressions of flow. =)
          • Re: Lookin for feedback

            Tue, June 30, 2009 - 11:10 AM
            And here we've stumbled upon the inherent problem with jargon: hard and clear definitions rarely abound. I think we can all wrap our heads around tech spinning, but it's my guess that Tankboy has never seen an all-flow spinner. If you don't have "techniques" or ritualized moves, then there's no "transitions" because there's nothing to transition from or to.

            The guy who got me spinning saw poi at the burn and came home to teach himself. He didn't have the HOP video guides, Circles of Light, Nick Woolsey, or the poi spinning basics DVD. He had transfixed crowds of desert ravers and a fair amount of audience feedback. He didn't use any "moves" by today's standards, he was just concerned about the complexity and variety of the "lightball" around him. Another fellow I know took one "move", the weave, broke it open, threw in a random direction for each hand and had a really nice show... also without "transitions". Can't transition from one more to the same move.

            I can see this becoming more common in the future as more people starting into fire, poi in particular, have access to enough (even too many) options for tech instruction, and never learn that they can flow without it. Trying to impose a limited view of flow onto tech will become the predominant definition of "flowing".
            • Re: Lookin for feedback

              Tue, June 30, 2009 - 11:35 AM
              Technique-a procedure used to accomplish a specific activity or task

              spinning a ball around in a circle is a technique. It's a procedure (spinnning a ball) that accomplishes a specific activity or task (making circles). To be fair, spinning a circle around your hand is a transition, too. It transitions from the top to the side to the bottom to the other side and back to the top. Flow begins to emerge from these two characteristics interacting with one another. You can't flow without these bare minimum essentials (well, okay, you could just hold it in your hand and dance without spinning, but I think we can agree that is not the kind of flow we are talking about here). The poi has to move (transition), and it requires a procedure (technique) to do it.
              • Re: Lookin for feedback

                Tue, June 30, 2009 - 12:04 PM
                Well, this is where things get fuzzy again. Many of the "moves" ARE transitions: 'thread the needle' is just a way to change the top hand in a butterfly; 'the weave' is a half-phased figure 8 with an extra spin; the mexican wave is just an overhead weave transition from front to back, etc. And yes, just getting the wick to move could be a "technique", it's not "tech" spinning. Tech involves defined, repeatable moves, usually named and categorized... like the weave, butterfly, and anti-spins.
                • Re: Lookin for feedback

                  Tue, June 30, 2009 - 12:31 PM
                  this is exactly right, there really is no such thing as a "move" there is technique, or different techniques that can be used to manipulate the in different ways.

                  I would say that a "purely flow spinner" is actually simply a beginner spinner. Someone who is limited in their expression through a lack of technique.

                  This is not to say that the technique should be the same for everyone. people develop their own technique and hence their own style, their own way of moving with the prop. however you can expand your capacity as a poi spinner by learning other peoples technique as well.


                  the mexican wave is actually thread the needle that goes over your head as well, i believe the move you refer to is shoulder reels, but regardless, whether you want to look at poi as dance or juggling, in all other art forms it is generally recognized that to become better at it is to train more, train the technique that you know, and learn new technique. in dance the stress of technique and form is the primary practice. a great dancer possesses the applicable technical control of their body to be able to do whatever the choreographer asks them to do (there are also expressive and emotional components, but that goes into theatrical training which is a completely independent issue)

                  so why is it that in the fire spinning community we generally refuse to recognize the fact that technical proficiency leads to a wider range of how you can express yourself, or ultimately better spinning. it is kind of taboo in our community to say better spinning, people spin for all kinds of reasons, but in other performance based art forms, to use juggling and dancing as examples, while there is some subjectivity involved, it is very common to refer to someone as a better dancer or better juggler.

                  Im not saying it is bad to not have much technique. everyone possesses the skills that they have and lacks others, and it is beautiful to see people express themselves no matter what kind of mastery they have achieved, but why is it so hard for this community to accept that the technique makes your capacity greater, ultimately making you a better fire spinner?


                  I know ill probably get some heat for this, but I really dont get it, I want to know what other people think, and how they feel, and ultimately, I want everyone to find what is right for them, within or outside of fire spinning.
                  • This is the maximum depth. Additional responses will not be threaded.

                    Re: Lookin for feedback

                    Tue, June 30, 2009 - 12:52 PM
                    Well, there is a certain amount of play in the definition of "better". It's more commonly seen in musicians where one person could be a more technically skilled piano player, but a good honky tonk player might connect to the crowd and thus be the preferred performer. Dance is odd because there are so many forms (I think fire is getting there), and I don't think that comparing ballet to tap is similar to comparing poi to staff. "Better" has to mean something first, it has to have a direction. When they say one ballet performer is better than another it's because there is, more or less, and idea method of dancing ballet. There is no "ideal' method of fire performance (yet), so the term "better" is guided by the perceptions of each person who uses or hears it. Tech spinners might define better as having more, or cleaner, tech moves, dancers might look more at the flow, and the audience will have a completely different definition.

                    For the most part, the audience doesn't give a damn about "moves" or 'techniques", even when they have ann announcer saying "wow, that was a triple lutz with a double sow-cow" (or whatever). They're mostly looking to be entertained. and from my experience, the deeper people get into learning and defining 'tech' moves, the farther from the audience they get. Eventually they lose the connection entirely and become some pretty picture on the stage. It's not terribly unlike the death of hard rock in the 80s: guitar heroes going off on 2 hour solos with a dozen air-guitar jocks trying desperately to follow along and 50,000 bored people waiting for their next favorite song.

                    Read the Jeet Kune Do. Bruce Lee learned many many martial arts in order to become 'invincible', and in the end discovered that each new art may have added a little to his technique, but also added drastically to the limitations inherent with each form. New forms added new limitations, and eventually he found he was almost unable to fight. He developed Jeet Kune Do as an "anti-form" with no defined moves to help erase these limitations. He introduced "flow" to martial arts.
                    • Re: Lookin for feedback

                      Tue, June 30, 2009 - 1:07 PM
                      there is this wonderful show on tv, called so you think you can dance.

                      the premise of it is they take the best dancers they can find from whatever style, and then make them dance choreography from all different styles of dance. they are in effect finding the best dancer, the one who has the greatest capacity to express him or herself through movement to music.

                      and yes, there is something great about a great blues guitarist, but that style is dated. i guess ultimately, certain technical advancements in fire spinning have made landmarks in firespinning style and we could look at each of these styles as periods in the history of modern fire spinning, but really...

                      are we going to start considering things in categories ie.
                      classic modern poi - lots of weaves and butterfly, no flowers
                      gardenia poi - weaves and flowers
                      poi renaissance - antispin, isolation, tangles

                      .....
                      really? ultimately the depth of technique in poi is not that great....ultimately, someone who runs around doing the weave, smiling at people, only feels comfortable with the weave.

                      like i said, better is determined subjectively,
                      however, having a greater capacity allows you to express all of those subjective tastes.

                      its not that someone choses to do the weave, its that someone doesnt have any choice.
                • Re: Lookin for feedback

                  Tue, June 30, 2009 - 1:08 PM
                  Now your confusing "technique" with "language". Technique is about "how" you do something. The languages used in Tech Poi or on HoP are teaching tools designed to aid in the development of technique. To call it Tech Poi doesn't mean that if it's not in there that it is not technique, nor does it have to be accepted by those forums to be considered Tech Poi.

                  I'm totally with Tankboy on the "tech improves overall freedom of movement". Rainbow Michael gives a great explanation in this video starting around 1:40. www.youtube.com/watch

                  >> "Many of the "moves" ARE transitions: 'thread the needle' is just a way to change the top hand in a butterfly"

                  Exactly my point. The minute you make the poi go around in a circle, flow is born. How (technique) you make the circles (transitions) move creates an expression of flow. I find it interesting that you (tedward) consider things like music and an audience (optional supplemental flow enhancers?) to be inherent in the creation and development of flow, more so than technique and transitions (mandatory flow components).

                  It gets fuzzy when words are limited to being interpretted only one way.
                  • This is the maximum depth. Additional responses will not be threaded.

                    Re: Lookin for feedback

                    Tue, June 30, 2009 - 1:17 PM
                    so flow happens at one of two points, but i cant agree that it is with the motion of the poi.

                    to me
                    the flow either forms at the source, internally, or transcendentally, or that flow forms with the change of the external world, as in, spinning a circle, statically has no flow, only motion, as soon as you move that circle, there is a change and that change is flow....

                    we use flow in two seperate ways in the spinning community.
                    we talk about it like hippies, existing within the flow
                    and we talk about it to describe spinning, her flow is silky smooth.

                    the first one happens regardless of spinning, so the spinning specific flow is ultimately, how ones techniques flow between eachother as you spin.

                    this can help induce a meditative state that some would describe as the first flow i mentioned, but again that has really no intrinsic association with spinning
                    • Re: Lookin for feedback

                      Tue, June 30, 2009 - 1:36 PM
                      I agree that there are varying degrees of flow, but to say that the higher flow of the cosmos (hippie flow) is separate from the lower flow of the electron (spinning flow) is a linear (either/or) interpretation of flow. The "either/or" has to be seen as the ends of the spectrum of flow. The poi flow around the hand to create one degree, the hand moves front to back to create another degree, the poi flow in relationship to one another to create another degree, and the two poi flow in relationship to the body to create another degree, and the spinner flows with the poi in relationship to the audience for another degree.

                      When these parts are present, they are inseparable, because they are built on top of each other.
                      • Re: Lookin for feedback

                        Tue, June 30, 2009 - 1:48 PM
                        but expressive flow, poi flow, isnt about that process, because that fractal exists no matter what is going on, and instead has to do with the aesthetic impressions the performance leaves on those who watch it

                        so poi flow exists within cosmic flow and there is room for cosmic flow in poi, but it is not a fundamental aspect to the practice of fire spinning
                        • Re: Lookin for feedback

                          Tue, June 30, 2009 - 2:23 PM
                          I can accept that we may not all be able to make the connection between the expressive flow of poi and the great cosmic energy that is flowing through the universe. Our ability to grasp and manipulate "that fractal that exists no matter what is going on" is, however, fundamental to our development as spinners. It is because flow exists in the cosmos that we can imitate it in our own little microcosm called "poi spinning". We aren't creating a new (different, separate) kind of flow, we are using the flow that already exists in new (creative, expressive) ways.
                          • Re: Lookin for feedback

                            Tue, June 30, 2009 - 5:50 PM
                            yeah yeah, we couldnt spin things if nothing could spin.

                            but because of our human condition, spinning poi is not viscerally linked to celestial or sub atomic orbits, only a vague intellectual link can be drawn there
                            • Re: Lookin for feedback

                              Tue, June 30, 2009 - 11:19 PM
                              perhaps your conclusions are a reflection of where you are in your journey. It is quite a bit more than a "vague intellectual link" to me. Maybe I have too much time on my hands... ;P
                              • Re: Lookin for feedback

                                Tue, June 30, 2009 - 11:33 PM
                                or its accepting ones place in the universe....
                                • Re: Lookin for feedback

                                  Tue, June 30, 2009 - 11:41 PM
                                  here and now... tech good. flow good. good talk, yeah? =)
                                  • Re: Lookin for feedback

                                    Wed, July 1, 2009 - 7:27 AM
                                    The conversation is so far afield from what the original posting person asked for, it is reminds me of someone talking on their cell phone during a movie. And now I have added to that, sorry.
                                    • Re: Lookin for feedback

                                      Wed, July 1, 2009 - 11:41 AM
                                      Yeah TvsF arguments often meander quite a bit like this. I step out when language itself is put into question. It pretty much stops being a debate at that point.
                                      • Re: Lookin for feedback

                                        Wed, July 1, 2009 - 1:29 PM
                                        thats just it though, there is no such thing as tech vs flow, there are only limits placed on ones flow by ones lack of technique.
                                        • Re: Lookin for feedback

                                          Wed, July 1, 2009 - 2:20 PM
                                          Nope, not getting into it again. I don't debate religion either.
                                          • Re: Lookin for feedback

                                            Wed, July 1, 2009 - 6:59 PM
                                            As Tankboy pointed out, it's only a debate because you think they are vs. one another instead of working together. Kinda silly to turn two things that work together against each other, and then say that you're not gonna talk about it because our language doesn't match. How can we ever overcome a language discrepancy if we don't talk about it?
                                            • Re: Lookin for feedback

                                              Fri, July 3, 2009 - 1:04 PM
                                              Thanks for the feedback... and the good reading material that the feedback turned into.

                                              For the record...they were a couple spins thrown together for my sisters friends who never saw fire before. The music that was actually playing was somethin akin to "Get Low" by Lil John. I just put the thievery in there cause i like it.

                                              I just thought i'd throw in that I've seen a couple different styles of picking up dropped toys. The first style is that you pick up the staff like nothing ever happened... I suppose this is more suited for choreographed & dance performance type shows. A second style is the more circus-oriented, sideshow type thing...where if you accidentally drop a tool, you look a little dissapointed and mope around for a bit...letting the audience feel more a part by building you back up again. I was just tryin to be goofy for my sisters friends...but it would have been MUCH cooler if i caught both of em! :)

                                              I'll look into Yuta footwork.

                                              Appreciate it yall. I'll be teaching a beginners poi workshop with another spinner in Asheville in a couple weeks, and I'm tryin to fill my brain with all types of stuff before then. Gonna be a mix of tech with flow...which seems to be what I need to work on..

                                              thanks again yall

                                              peace!

Recent topics in "Art of Poi"

Topic Author Replies Last Post
sock vs string offlinesasha 17 November 4, 2009
what's YOUR favorite music to spin poi to? Unsubscribed 50 November 3, 2009
partner poi video offline~A.roar.A~ 3 October 30, 2009
Performance contract... Emily 0 October 29, 2009